Friday, September 28, 2012

Fred Olsen Energy and deep waters

It's been a while since I took a good look at Fred Olsen Energy (Oslo OSE: FOE), which according to company web site
"provides exploration and production services to the offshore oil and gas industry building on 150 years experience in shipping and more than 35 years in offshore drilling." 
Byford Dolphin oil exploration rig in dry dock at Invergordon (Scotland) on 2008 (source: User Jetset / Wikipedia)

We have had that stock now over 2 years in the portfolio. At the time of writing it had closed at 255 NOK about +44% above our purchase price of 176,50 NOK in Oslo Børs (stock exchange of Oslo, Norway). The yield has been good. They have paid 20 NOK dividend per share this year and last year making the yield 11,3% p.a. for the original investment. However, the company has stated to pursue strategy to pay a dividend of NOK 10 per share. In the last two years the company has paid extraordinary dividend of NOK 10 per share. A concervative future yield estimate is thus to be calculated with NOK 10 per share meaning 3,9% yield at NOK 255 stock price level.

Market cap of the company is NOK 17 billion (about USD 3 billion). P/E (2011) is 8,2. This assumes net result after tax to be NOK 2083 million (result for 2011). The company has been making about NOK 2 billion net result for last 5 years except for 2009 (2,7 billion) and for 2007 (1,4 billion). Nordnet gives the following financial figures for current share price of NOK 255:
  • ROE 28%
  • P/E 8,7
  • P/B 2,4
  • P/S 2,8 
The income statement for the first half of 2012 looks solid. With total revenues of 3348 million NOK the company delivered net profit of 984 million NOK. That's 29,4% out of revenue! The balance sheet looks OK to me. Most of the assets are tied into property, plant & equipment (drill ships and rigs etc.). There is enough cash to cover for twice the amount of current interest bearing debt. In general current assets are >50% bigger than current liabilities. Equity at 7667 million NOK is bigger than non-current interest bearing debt at 5231 million NOK. To me it seems the company is not overly leveraged.

Net cash flow from operating activities look good. However, the company has been making sizable investments in 2Q 2012 and therefore net change of cash has been negative. Dividend of 1325 million NOK paid in Q2 2012 is less than net cash flow from operating activities from 1H 2012 alone (1606 million NOK) so even the elevated dividend level of NOK 20 does not look high compared to cash flow.
 
The Company, subsidiaries and major owners

Fred. Olsen Energy ASA, headquartered in Oslo, Norway,  is a holding company and provides management services to the subsidiaries within the Group:

The drilling segment delivers practically all of the net result. The Engineering & fabrication segment (Harland and Wolff) is small in comparison.
 
The Dolphin Drilling companies form the drilling contracting business activities of Fred. Olsen Energy ASA.
 "Dolphin Drilling is one of the longest established independent drilling contracting companies in the offshore arena tracing its roots back to the earliest offshore exploration activity in the North Sea in the mid nineteen sixties. The Fred Olsen family’s interest pre-dates this with a history in shipping activity stretching over 150 years."
The Olsen family is a major shareholder (53.4%) via their holding companies:


The Fleet

 
 
 
 
Fleet summary. Information from company web site and annual report 2011.
 
The offshore fleet of Fred. Olsen Energy ASA with subsidiaries consists of two deepwater units and six mid-water semi-submersible drilling rigs in addition to one accommodation unit. The Group has two newbuilds under construction, an ultra deepwater drillship scheduled to be delivered in 3Q 2013 and an ultra deepwater semi submersible for harsh environment scheduled to be delivered in 1Q 2015.
 
Contractual situation looks pretty good. There are long contracts for both drill ships with Anadarko Petroleum Co. There is also long contracts for Byford Dolphin and Borgsten Dolphin. Rest are ending between Q4 2012 and Q1 2014 according to company web site.
 
Deepwater drilling vessels - semisubmersible and drilling ship (source: Wikipedia)
 
It's worth to note that Blackford Dolphin, the deep water semi-submersible drilling rig, was estimated to be worth 3459 million NOK at end of 2011 according to annual report. Alone that's about third of net book value of all their rigs and drillships. Basically over half of assets were tied to two deep water units and the ultra-deep water Bolette Dolphin drill ship under construction at end of 2011. With the ultra-deep water semi-submersible drilling rig targeted to be finished 2015 the company will have significant portion of company net assets in the deep water and ultra-deep water segments.
 
The definition of "deep water" seems to vary in the industry and has shifted over the years with technical advances. This company considers 1000-1750 feet mid-water, while U.S. government definition of deep water shifted from 1000 feet to 500 feet after Deepwater Horizon -accident in Gulf of Mexico. The 500 feet limit seems to come from the fact that the intervention in the well at the seafloor switches from divers to Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) at about 500 feet. A government report from UK concluded this also to be an obvious threshold for deep water operations. According to this definition all the the assets of Fred Olsen Energy are "deep water" or "ultra deep".
 
Regardless of the definitions, it seems that the offshore oil exploration and production is moving to ever deeper depths. An interesting perspective is that 162 year old oil industry started deep water exploration in 1975 and production 20 years later in 1995. Anyway, deep waters is where the day rates are today the highest and that's also where the demand increasingly is likely to be for drill ships and rigs.
 

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Hard disk drive manufacturers poised to make a killing

Valuations of the two market leading hard disk drive (HDD) manufacturers Seagate (STX) and Western Digital (WDC) reflect the widespread belief that the days of HDD as the key solution for storing information are numbered.

To understand whether the demise of HDD is correctly predicted, I dug deeper into the following topics most commonly cited to be the reason for the depressed valuations of these companies:

  • Death of traditional PC
  • Shift to cloud
  • Solid-state drive (SSD) replacing HDD


Thursday, July 26, 2012

Asset Allocation

I track our asset allocation usually monthly. As said in the previous post, I have heavily increased our allocation to selected IT stocks this year. Therefore, I thought that it is good time to writen an update on where I believe our money will give the best returns given our time horizon and risk profile.


Asset Allocation

Stocks 91%
Gold 9%
Cash -
Bonds -

This kind of allocation means
1. our investment time horizon is decades long (hence my pseudonym "UltraLong" :-)
2. we accept high risk (high volatility)

If you are not familiar with asset allocation, then I recommend reading about it. For example, "Beginners' Guide to Asset Allocation, Diversification, and Rebalancing" by U.S Securities and Exchange Commission.

The basic guides do not talk about gold. However, you can think it as cash that in long run will hold its value better than any other currency. Gold does not yield anything, but it should offset inflation in long run. It is also a hedge for very bad times. You can find more about Gold as portfolio diversificator from e.g. World Gold Council web pages. Gold has low correlation to many other asset classes. The correlation is especially low to stock indexes. Therefore, it makes good hedge and diversificator for a portfolio such as ours. However, you should be aware that our allocation to gold is a lot higher than recommended in several studies about asset allocation that I have seen. On the other hand, omitting cash and bonds is also against all rules of "safe" or "optimal" asset allocation.

I omit cash and cash-equivalents because the real returns (real = after inflation) there are typically negative or nonexistent. Also, we have hopefully long work careers ahead of us meaning we can continue to save for a long time still. This means our current investments represent only a fraction of our cumulative earnings between the day we started working and the day we retire.

I have to admit I haven't really studied bond investing that much. I know the basics and the fact that with ETFs and mutual funds you can invest quite easily to bond market and achieve diversification at the same time. If I would invest into bonds, I would probably go for corporate bonds. However, I prefer to be owner of companies rather than a creditor for the following reasons:
  • I don't believe that we are going to have decades long deflationary spiral in the western world. I rather believe authorities will do everything they can do avoid this and cause inflation.
    • Inflating debt away is the oldest trick in the book for countries with own central bank
  • Yeilds are at all time low. When they finally go up, bond values go down. Even if you are holding to maturity you may have poor yield vs. inflation or alternative investments.
  • Stocks are beaten so low that the yields are very attractive vs. bonds. Corporations with adequate pricing power can raise prices with inflation and as a bonus they might even grow.

Stock Allocation

Geographically our allocation is
  • Europe 43%
  • North America 39%
  • Emerging Markets 17%

Sector allocation
  • Information Technology 33%
  • Communication Service Providers 18%
  • Health Care 12%
  • Oil & Gas Production 11%
  • Low Emission Power Generation 9%
  • Mining & Exploration 7%
  • Other 9%

Since we own gold miners our combined allocation to gold and gold mining is 14,4% of all assets.


Our Top 5 holdings are at the time of writing (percentage marks "out of all assets"):
  • Nokia 7,8%
  • China Mobile 6,6%
  • Western Digital 6,1%
  • Intel 5,7%
  • Microsoft 5,7%

Please check "Note about risk profile" from the sidebar to understand better why we can take a lot more risk than what is recommended even for professional investors.

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Portfolio update

In the past month I have been making some changes to our portfolio. I have sold shares in AstraZeneca and Lithium ETF. I wanted to increase our allocation to Information Technology sector and some other sectors needed to be pruned. This leaves 21 companies and 1 ETF to keep track of. That's plenty for me.

Our sector allocation has now tilted quite heavily to Information Technology, which has by far the largest allocation (29%). Other sectors are close to 10-15% range. It is good to note that I follow quite closely what famous value investors are doing. According to Dataroma they are also exposed to IT sector although they do seem to love financials even more. Currently our allocation to that sector is zero.

Microsoft and Cisco Systems are among the Top 10 most owned stocks, but they haven't been adding to those positions lately. Rather they have been going after Oracle, Google, Apple and HP in the last 6 months. Overall, the big companies in IT sector seem to attract value investors and I do agree with them that there is indeed value to be found from many companies in that sector.

Sunday, June 10, 2012

When the Euro crisis will end?

Not a day goes by that something is written about the "Euro crisis" in newspapers. Now it seems that Spain is joining Portugal, Ireland and Greece to ask for some sort of emergency funding. There seems to be speculation about the amount of money needed between tens of billions and 100 billion euros. Anyway - lot's of money.

I have lost track of all the "facilities" through which funds are directed to the countries in need. Also, it seems that there is a dangerous pattern of declaring "emergency over" after "stress tests" or simply spending XX billions on the problem. The confidence isn't just quite restored yet. I have no idea when it will be and have come to a conclusion that probably nobody knows fully what is ahead of us.

Greece started the show in 2010 with getting emergency funding worth 45 billion euros in March and additional 110 billion in May. Ireland followed with 67,5 billion euros late 2010 and then Portugal got 78 billion euros in May 2011. Last summer Greece came once more back and total funding to that direction has ballooned to 285 billion euros. So there is already one example of a country coming back for more.

Thus, it's a bit hard to believe 100 billion is going to solve all of the problems in Spain - a much bigger country in terms of population and economy than Greece. The s**t will really hit the fan if Italy comes in and completes the pejorative acronym "PIIGS" used by many to reference these countries.

Our defensive posture with regards to portfolio allocation looks better every day.


Source for emergency loan figures and timing: Helsingin Sanomat 9th of June 2012